Repukingbuking Bush
Supreme Court gives Bush the smackdown on Guantanamo. Again.
(Except for Scalia, who reacts predictably as an insecure, megalomaniacal and probably impotent 72-year-old would, trotting out that tired old "more dead Americans" line that always seems to rally Republican supporters. But never convince INTELLIGENT people.)
I wonder howposteriors posterity will judge this Administration...?
(Except for Scalia, who reacts predictably as an insecure, megalomaniacal and probably impotent 72-year-old would, trotting out that tired old "more dead Americans" line that always seems to rally Republican supporters. But never convince INTELLIGENT people.)
I wonder how
5 Comments:
It was a sweet ruling. However, it's sorta, okay totally, disturbing that the Chief Justice was on the dissenting side. Shouldn't the leader of the court have some grasp of the Constitution? Oh, my bad, Bush appointed him so naturally being versed in the Constitution wasn't a job requirement. Only thing that matter was a love of big business and fetuses.
Crikey, can I ever get through a comment without a typo? "matters"
An administration that got away with everything because the Democrats are pussies. - Sunita
Sarah: That's OK, the rest of your comment was so brilliant that we didn't even notice the typo--until you mentioned it! D'oh! :-) Yes, our Chimp-in-Chief has had a very easy time of it thanks to his hand-picked, just-add-water-and-watch-it-grow government. (I'd like to add urine, just to see what they'd come up with...)
Sunita: Yes. Nancy Pelosi started rolling over as soon as we got our (slender) majority. What were we thinking? (I guess the better question is, "WERE we thinking?" It sure doesn't seem like it. And we certainly didn't fight hard enough for the things that mattered to us.)
Go to Google and type in the words "who is a failure" then I think the truth will out. Ed
Post a Comment
<< Home